“In the name of the Prophet—figs!!”

Cry of the Turkish fig-peddler.

I presume everybody has heard of me. My name is the Signora

Psyche Zenobia. This I know to be a fact. Nobody but my enemies

ever calls me Suky Snobbs. I have been assured that Suky is but a

vulgar corruption of Psyche, which is good Greek, and means “the

soul” (that’s me, I’m all soul) and sometimes “a butterfly,”

which latter meaning undoubtedly alludes to my appearance in my

new crimson satin dress, with the sky-blue Arabian mantelet, and

the trimmings of green agraffas, and the seven flounces of

orange-colored auriculas. As for Snobbs—any person who should

look at me would be instantly aware that my name wasn’t Snobbs.

Miss Tabitha Turnip propagated that report through sheer envy.

Tabitha Turnip indeed! Oh the little wretch! But what can we

expect from a turnip? Wonder if she remembers the old adage about

blood out of a turnip,” &c.? [Mem. put her in mind of it the

first opportunity.] [Mem. again—pull her nose.] Where was I? Ah!

I have been assured that Snobbs is a mere corruption of Zenobia,

and that Zenobia was a queen—(So am I. Dr. Moneypenny always

calls me the Queen of the Hearts)—and that Zenobia, as well as

Psyche, is good Greek, and that my father was “a Greek,” and that

consequently I have a right to our patronymic, which is Zenobia

and not by any means Snobbs. Nobody but Tabitha Turnip calls me

Suky Snobbs. I am the Signora Psyche Zenobia.

As I said before, everybody has heard of me. I am that very

Signora Psyche Zenobia, so justly celebrated as corresponding

secretary to the “Philadelphia, Regular, Exchange, Tea, Total,

Young, Belles, Lettres, Universal, Experimental, Bibliographical,

Association, To, Civilize, Humanity.” Dr. Moneypenny made the

title for us, and says he chose it because it sounded big like an

empty rum-puncheon. (A vulgar man that sometimes—but he’s deep.)

We all sign the initials of the society after our names, in the

fashion of the R. S. A., Royal Society of Arts—the S. D. U. K.,

Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, &c, &c. Dr.

Moneypenny says that S. stands for stale, and that D. U. K.

spells duck, (but it don’t,) that S. D. U. K. stands for Stale

Duck and not for Lord Brougham’s society—but then Dr. Moneypenny

is such a queer man that I am never sure when he is telling me

the truth. At any rate we always add to our names the initials P.

R. E. T. T. Y. B. L. U. E. B. A. T. C. H.—that is to say,

Philadelphia, Regular, Exchange, Tea, Total, Young, Belles,

Lettres, Universal, Experimental, Bibliographical, Association,

To, Civilize, Humanity—one letter for each word, which is a

decided improvement upon Lord Brougham. Dr. Moneypenny will have

it that our initials give our true character—but for my life I

can’t see what he means.

Notwithstanding the good offices of the Doctor, and the strenuous

exertions of the association to get itself into notice, it met

with no very great success until I joined it. The truth is, the

members indulged in too flippant a tone of discussion. The papers

read every Saturday evening were characterized less by depth than

buffoonery. They were all whipped syllabub. There was no

investigation of first causes, first principles. There was no

investigation of any thing at all. There was no attention paid to

that great point, the “fitness of things.” In short there was no

fine writing like this. It was all low—very! No profundity, no

reading, no metaphysics—nothing which the learned call

spirituality, and which the unlearned choose to stigmatize as

cant. [Dr. M. says I ought to spell “cant” with a capital K—but I

know better.]

When I joined the society it was my endeavor to introduce a

better style of thinking and writing, and all the world knows how

well I have succeeded. We get up as good papers now in the P. R.

E. T. T. Y. B. L. U. E. B. A. T. C. H. as any to be found even in

Blackwood. I say, Blackwood, because I have been assured that the

finest writing, upon every subject, is to be discovered in the

pages of that justly celebrated Magazine. We now take it for our

model upon all themes, and are getting into rapid notice

accordingly. And, after all, it’s not so very difficult a matter

to compose an article of the genuine Blackwood stamp, if one only

goes properly about it. Of course I don’t speak of the political

articles. Everybody knows how they are managed, since Dr.

Moneypenny explained it. Mr. Blackwood has a pair of

tailor’s-shears, and three apprentices who stand by him for

orders. One hands him the “Times,” another the “Examiner” and a

third a “Culley’s New Compendium of Slang-Whang.” Mr. B. merely

cuts out and intersperses. It is soon done—nothing but

“Examiner,” “Slang-Whang,” and “Times”—then “Times,”

“Slang-Whang,” and “Examiner”—and then “Times,” “Examiner,” and

“Slang-Whang.”

But the chief merit of the Magazine lies in its miscellaneous

articles; and the best of these come under the head of what Dr.

Moneypenny calls the bizarreries (whatever that may mean) and

what everybody else calls the intensities. This is a species of

writing which I have long known how to appreciate, although it is

only since my late visit to Mr. Blackwood (deputed by the

society) that I have been made aware of the exact method of

composition. This method is very simple, but not so much so as

the politics. Upon my calling at Mr. B.‘s, and making known to

him the wishes of the society, he received me with great

civility, took me into his study, and gave me a clear explanation

of the whole process.

“My dear madam,” said he, evidently struck with my majestic

appearance, for I had on the crimson satin, with the green

agraffas, and orange-colored auriclas. “My dear madam,” said he,

“sit down. The matter stands thus: In the first place your writer

of intensities must have very black ink, and a very big pen, with

a very blunt nib. And, mark me, Miss Psyche Zenobia!” he

continued, after a pause, with the most expressive energy and

solemnity of manner, “mark me!—that pen—must—never be mended!

Herein, madam, lies the secret, the soul, of intensity. I assume

upon myself to say, that no individual, of however great genius

ever wrote with a good pen—understand me,—a good article. You may

take, it for granted, that when manuscript can be read it is

never worth reading. This is a leading principle in our faith, to

which if you cannot readily assent, our conference is at an end.”

He paused. But, of course, as I had no wish to put an end to the

conference, I assented to a proposition so very obvious, and one,

too, of whose truth I had all along been sufficiently aware. He

seemed pleased, and went on with his instructions.

“It may appear invidious in me, Miss Psyche Zenobia, to refer you

to any article, or set of articles, in the way of model or study,

yet perhaps I may as well call your attention to a few cases. Let

me see. There was ‘The Dead Alive,’ a capital thing!—the record

of a gentleman’s sensations when entombed before the breath was

out of his body—full of tastes, terror, sentiment, metaphysics,

and erudition. You would have sworn that the writer had been born

and brought up in a coffin. Then we had the ‘Confessions of an

Opium-eater’—fine, very fine!—glorious imagination—deep

philosophy acute speculation—plenty of fire and fury, and a good

spicing of the decidedly unintelligible. That was a nice bit of

flummery, and went down the throats of the people delightfully.

They would have it that Coleridge wrote the paper—but not so. It

was composed by my pet baboon, Juniper, over a rummer of Hollands

and water, ‘hot, without sugar.’” [This I could scarcely have

believed had it been anybody but Mr. Blackwood, who assured me of

it.] “Then there was ‘The Involuntary Experimentalist,’ all about

a gentleman who got baked in an oven, and came out alive and

well, although certainly done to a turn. And then there was ‘The

Diary of a Late Physician,’ where the merit lay in good rant, and

indifferent Greek—both of them taking things with the public. And

then there was ‘The Man in the Bell,’ a paper by-the-by, Miss

Zenobia, which I cannot sufficiently recommend to your attention.

It is the history of a young person who goes to sleep under the

clapper of a church bell, and is awakened by its tolling for a

funeral. The sound drives him mad, and, accordingly, pulling out

his tablets, he gives a record of his sensations. Sensations are

the great things after all. Should you ever be drowned or hung,

be sure and make a note of your sensations—they will be worth to

you ten guineas a sheet. If you wish to write forcibly, Miss

Zenobia, pay minute attention to the sensations.”

“That I certainly will, Mr. Blackwood,” said I.

“Good!” he replied. “I see you are a pupil after my own heart.

But I must put you au fait to the details necessary in composing

what may be denominated a genuine Blackwood article of the

sensation stamp—the kind which you will understand me to say I

consider the best for all purposes.

“The first thing requisite is to get yourself into such a scrape

as no one ever got into before. The oven, for instance,—that was

a good hit. But if you have no oven or big bell, at hand, and if

you cannot conveniently tumble out of a balloon, or be swallowed

up in an earthquake, or get stuck fast in a chimney, you will

have to be contented with simply imagining some similar

misadventure. I should prefer, however, that you have the actual

fact to bear you out. Nothing so well assists the fancy, as an

experimental knowledge of the matter in hand. ‘Truth is strange,’

you know, ‘stranger than fiction’—besides being more to the

purpose.”

Here I assured him I had an excellent pair of garters, and would

go and hang myself forthwith.

“Good!” he replied, “do so;—although hanging is somewhat

hacknied. Perhaps you might do better. Take a dose of Brandreth’s

pills, and then give us your sensations. However, my instructions

will apply equally well to any variety of misadventure, and in

your way home you may easily get knocked in the head, or run over

by an omnibus, or bitten by a mad dog, or drowned in a gutter.

But to proceed.

“Having determined upon your subject, you must next consider the

tone, or manner, of your narration. There is the tone didactic,

the tone enthusiastic, the tone natural—all commonplace enough.

But then there is the tone laconic, or curt, which has lately

come much into use. It consists in short sentences. Somehow thus:

Can’t be too brief. Can’t be too snappish. Always a full stop.

And never a paragraph.

“Then there is the tone elevated, diffusive, and interjectional.

Some of our best novelists patronize this tone. The words must be

all in a whirl, like a humming-top, and make a noise very

similar, which answers remarkably well instead of meaning. This

is the best of all possible styles where the writer is in too

great a hurry to think.

“The tone metaphysical is also a good one. If you know any big

words this is your chance for them. Talk of the Ionic and Eleatic

schools—of Archytas, Gorgias, and Alcmaeon. Say something about

objectivity and subjectivity. Be sure and abuse a man named

Locke. Turn up your nose at things in general, and when you let

slip any thing a little too absurd, you need not be at the

trouble of scratching it out, but just add a footnote and say

that you are indebted for the above profound observation to the

‘Kritik der reinem Vernunft,’ or to the ‘Metaphysithe

Anfongsgrunde der Noturwissenchaft.’ This would look erudite

and—and—and frank.

“There are various other tones of equal celebrity, but I shall

mention only two more—the tone transcendental and the tone

heterogeneous. In the former the merit consists in seeing into

the nature of affairs a very great deal farther than anybody

else. This second sight is very efficient when properly managed.

A little reading of the ‘Dial’ will carry you a great way.

Eschew, in this case, big words; get them as small as possible,

and write them upside down. Look over Channing’s poems and quote

what he says about a ‘fat little man with a delusive show of

Can.’ Put in something about the Supernal Oneness. Don’t say a

syllable about the Infernal Twoness. Above all, study innuendo.

Hint everything—assert nothing. If you feel inclined to say

‘bread and butter,’ do not by any means say it outright. You may

say any thing and every thing approaching to ‘bread and butter.’

You may hint at buck-wheat cake, or you may even go so far as to

insinuate oat-meal porridge, but if bread and butter be your real

meaning, be cautious, my dear Miss Psyche, not on any account to

say ‘bread and butter!’”

I assured him that I should never say it again as long as I

lived. He kissed me and continued:

“As for the tone heterogeneous, it is merely a judicious mixture,

in equal proportions, of all the other tones in the world, and is

consequently made up of every thing deep, great, odd, piquant,

pertinent, and pretty.

“Let us suppose now you have determined upon your incidents and

tone. The most important portion—in fact, the soul of the whole

business, is yet to be attended to—I allude to the filling up. It

is not to be supposed that a lady, or gentleman either, has been

leading the life of a book worm. And yet above all things it is

necessary that your article have an air of erudition, or at least

afford evidence of extensive general reading. Now I’ll put you in

the way of accomplishing this point. See here!” (pulling down

some three or four ordinary-looking volumes, and opening them at

random). “By casting your eye down almost any page of any book in

the world, you will be able to perceive at once a host of little

scraps of either learning or bel-esprit-ism, which are the very

thing for the spicing of a Blackwood article. You might as well

note down a few while I read them to you. I shall make two

divisions: first, Piquant Facts for the Manufacture of Similes,

and, second, Piquant Expressions to be introduced as occasion may

require. Write now!”—and I wrote as he dictated.

“PIQUANT FACTS FOR SIMILES. ‘There were originally but three

Muses—Melete, Mneme, Aœde—meditation, memory, and singing.’ You

may make a good deal of that little fact if properly worked. You

see it is not generally known, and looks recherché. You must be

careful and give the thing with a downright improviso air.

“Again. ‘The river Alpheus passed beneath the sea, and emerged

without injury to the purity of its waters.’ Rather stale that,

to be sure, but, if properly dressed and dished up, will look

quite as fresh as ever.

“Here is something better. ‘The Persian Iris appears to some

persons to possess a sweet and very powerful perfume, while to

others it is perfectly scentless.’ Fine that, and very delicate!

Turn it about a little, and it will do wonders. We’ll have some

thing else in the botanical line. There’s nothing goes down so

well, especially with the help of a little Latin. Write!

“‘The Epidendrum Flos Aeris, of Java, bears a very beautiful

flower, and will live when pulled up by the roots. The natives

suspend it by a cord from the ceiling, and enjoy its fragrance

for years.’ That’s capital! That will do for the similes. Now for

the Piquant Expressions.

“PIQUANT EXPRESSIONS. ‘The Venerable Chinese novel Ju-Kiao-Li.’

Good! By introducing these few words with dexterity you will

evince your intimate acquaintance with the language and

literature of the Chinese. With the aid of this you may either

get along without either Arabic, or Sanscrit, or Chickasaw. There

is no passing muster, however, without Spanish, Italian, German,

Latin, and Greek. I must look you out a little specimen of each.

Any scrap will answer, because you must depend upon your own

ingenuity to make it fit into your article. Now write!

“‘Aussi tendre que Zaire’—as tender as Zaire-French. Alludes to

the frequent repetition of the phrase, la tendre Zaire, in the

French tragedy of that name. Properly introduced, will show not

only your knowledge of the language, but your general reading and

wit. You can say, for instance, that the chicken you were eating

(write an article about being choked to death by a chicken-bone)

was not altogether aussi tendre que Zaire. Write!

‘Van muerte tan escondida,

Que no te sienta venir,

Porque el plazer del morir,

No mestorne a dar la vida.’

“That’s Spanish—from Miguel de Cervantes. ‘Come quickly, O death!

but be sure and don’t let me see you coming, lest the pleasure I

shall feel at your appearance should unfortunately bring me back

again to life.’ This you may slip in quite a propos when you are

struggling in the last agonies with the chicken-bone. Write!

‘Il pover ‘huomo che non se’n era accorto,

Andava combattendo, e era morto.‘

“That’s Italian, you perceive—from Ariosto. It means that a great

hero, in the heat of combat, not perceiving that he had been

fairly killed, continued to fight valiantly, dead as he was. The

application of this to your own case is obvious—for I trust, Miss

Psyche, that you will not neglect to kick for at least an hour

and a half after you have been choked to death by that

chicken-bone. Please to write!

‘Und sterb’ich doch, no sterb’ich denn

Durch sie—durch sie!’’

“That’s German—from Schiller. ‘And if I die, at least I die—for

thee—for thee!’ Here it is clear that you are apostrophizing the

cause of your disaster, the chicken. Indeed what gentleman (or

lady either) of sense, wouldn’t die, I should like to know, for a

well fattened capon of the right Molucca breed, stuffed with

capers and mushrooms, and served up in a salad-bowl, with

orange-jellies en mosaïques. Write! (You can get them that way

at Tortoni’s)—Write, if you please!

“Here is a nice little Latin phrase, and rare too, (one can’t be

too recherché or brief in one’s Latin, it’s getting so

common—ignoratio elenchi. He has committed an ignoratio

elenchi—that is to say, he has understood the words of your

proposition, but not the idea. The man was a fool, you see. Some

poor fellow whom you address while choking with that

chicken-bone, and who therefore didn’t precisely understand what

you were talking about. Throw the ignoratio elenchi in his teeth,

and, at once, you have him annihilated. If he dares to reply, you

can tell him from Lucan (here it is) that speeches are mere

anemonae verborum, anemone words. The anemone, with great

brilliancy, has no smell. Or, if he begins to bluster, you may be

down upon him with insomnia Jovis, reveries of Jupiter—a phrase

which Silius Italicus (see here!) applies to thoughts pompous and

inflated. This will be sure and cut him to the heart. He can do

nothing but roll over and die. Will you be kind enough to write?

“In Greek we must have some thing pretty—from Demosthenes, for

example. Ανερο φευων και παλιν μαχεσεται. [Aner o pheugoen kai

palin makesetai.] There is a tolerably good translation of it in

Hudibras—

‘For he that flies may fight again,

Which he can never do that’s slain.’

In a Blackwood article nothing makes so fine a show as your

Greek. The very letters have an air of profundity about them.

Only observe, madam, the astute look of that Epsilon! That Phi

ought certainly to be a bishop! Was ever there a smarter fellow

than that Omicron? Just twig that Tau! In short, there is nothing

like Greek for a genuine sensation-paper. In the present case

your application is the most obvious thing in the world. Rap out

the sentence, with a huge oath, and by way of ultimatum at the

good-for-nothing dunder-headed villain who couldn’t understand

your plain English in relation to the chicken-bone. He’ll take

the hint and be off, you may depend upon it.”

These were all the instructions Mr. B. could afford me upon the

topic in question, but I felt they would be entirely sufficient.

I was, at length, able to write a genuine Blackwood article, and

determined to do it forthwith. In taking leave of me, Mr. B. made

a proposition for the purchase of the paper when written; but as

he could offer me only fifty guineas a sheet, I thought it better

to let our society have it, than sacrifice it for so paltry a

sum. Notwithstanding this niggardly spirit, however, the

gentleman showed his consideration for me in all other respects,

and indeed treated me with the greatest civility. His parting

words made a deep impression upon my heart, and I hope I shall

always remember them with gratitude.

“My dear Miss Zenobia,” he said, while the tears stood in his

eyes, “is there anything else I can do to promote the success of

your laudable undertaking? Let me reflect! It is just possible

that you may not be able, so soon as convenient, to—to—get

yourself drowned, or—choked with a chicken-bone, or—or

hung,—or—bitten by a—but stay! Now I think me of it, there are a

couple of very excellent bull-dogs in the yard—fine fellows, I

assure you—savage, and all that—indeed just the thing for your

money—they’ll have you eaten up, auricula and all, in less than

five minutes (here’s my watch!)—and then only think of the

sensations! Here! I say—Tom!—Peter!—Dick, you villain!—let out

those”—but as I was really in a great hurry, and had not another

moment to spare, I was reluctantly forced to expedite my

departure, and accordingly took leave at once—somewhat more

abruptly, I admit, than strict courtesy would have otherwise

allowed.

It was my primary object upon quitting Mr. Blackwood, to get into

some immediate difficulty, pursuant to his advice, and with this

view I spent the greater part of the day in wandering about

Edinburgh, seeking for desperate adventures—adventures adequate

to the intensity of my feelings, and adapted to the vast

character of the article I intended to write. In this excursion I

was attended by one negro servant, Pompey, and my little lap-dog

Diana, whom I had brought with me from Philadelphia. It was not,

however, until late in the afternoon that I fully succeeded in my

arduous undertaking. An important event then happened of which

the following Blackwood article, in the tone heterogeneous, is

the substance and result.

“In the name of the Prophet—figs!!”

Cry of the Turkish fig-peddler.

I presume everybody has heard of me. My name is the Signora

Psyche Zenobia. This I know to be a fact. Nobody but my enemies

ever calls me Suky Snobbs. I have been assured that Suky is but a

vulgar corruption of Psyche, which is good Greek, and means “the

soul” (that’s me, I’m all soul) and sometimes “a butterfly,”

which latter meaning undoubtedly alludes to my appearance in my

new crimson satin dress, with the sky-blue Arabian mantelet, and

the trimmings of green agraffas, and the seven flounces of

orange-colored auriculas. As for Snobbs—any person who should

look at me would be instantly aware that my name wasn’t Snobbs.

Miss Tabitha Turnip propagated that report through sheer envy.

Tabitha Turnip indeed! Oh the little wretch! But what can we

expect from a turnip? Wonder if she remembers the old adage about

blood out of a turnip,” &c.? [Mem. put her in mind of it the

first opportunity.] [Mem. again—pull her nose.] Where was I? Ah!

I have been assured that Snobbs is a mere corruption of Zenobia,

and that Zenobia was a queen—(So am I. Dr. Moneypenny always

calls me the Queen of the Hearts)—and that Zenobia, as well as

Psyche, is good Greek, and that my father was “a Greek,” and that

consequently I have a right to our patronymic, which is Zenobia

and not by any means Snobbs. Nobody but Tabitha Turnip calls me

Suky Snobbs. I am the Signora Psyche Zenobia.

As I said before, everybody has heard of me. I am that very

Signora Psyche Zenobia, so justly celebrated as corresponding

secretary to the “Philadelphia, Regular, Exchange, Tea, Total,

Young, Belles, Lettres, Universal, Experimental, Bibliographical,

Association, To, Civilize, Humanity.” Dr. Moneypenny made the

title for us, and says he chose it because it sounded big like an

empty rum-puncheon. (A vulgar man that sometimes—but he’s deep.)

We all sign the initials of the society after our names, in the

fashion of the R. S. A., Royal Society of Arts—the S. D. U. K.,

Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, &c, &c. Dr.

Moneypenny says that S. stands for stale, and that D. U. K.

spells duck, (but it don’t,) that S. D. U. K. stands for Stale

Duck and not for Lord Brougham’s society—but then Dr. Moneypenny

is such a queer man that I am never sure when he is telling me

the truth. At any rate we always add to our names the initials P.

R. E. T. T. Y. B. L. U. E. B. A. T. C. H.—that is to say,

Philadelphia, Regular, Exchange, Tea, Total, Young, Belles,

Lettres, Universal, Experimental, Bibliographical, Association,

To, Civilize, Humanity—one letter for each word, which is a

decided improvement upon Lord Brougham. Dr. Moneypenny will have

it that our initials give our true character—but for my life I

can’t see what he means.

Notwithstanding the good offices of the Doctor, and the strenuous

exertions of the association to get itself into notice, it met

with no very great success until I joined it. The truth is, the

members indulged in too flippant a tone of discussion. The papers

read every Saturday evening were characterized less by depth than

buffoonery. They were all whipped syllabub. There was no

investigation of first causes, first principles. There was no

investigation of any thing at all. There was no attention paid to

that great point, the “fitness of things.” In short there was no

fine writing like this. It was all low—very! No profundity, no

reading, no metaphysics—nothing which the learned call

spirituality, and which the unlearned choose to stigmatize as

cant. [Dr. M. says I ought to spell “cant” with a capital K—but I

know better.]

When I joined the society it was my endeavor to introduce a

better style of thinking and writing, and all the world knows how

well I have succeeded. We get up as good papers now in the P. R.

E. T. T. Y. B. L. U. E. B. A. T. C. H. as any to be found even in

Blackwood. I say, Blackwood, because I have been assured that the

finest writing, upon every subject, is to be discovered in the

pages of that justly celebrated Magazine. We now take it for our

model upon all themes, and are getting into rapid notice

accordingly. And, after all, it’s not so very difficult a matter

to compose an article of the genuine Blackwood stamp, if one only

goes properly about it. Of course I don’t speak of the political

articles. Everybody knows how they are managed, since Dr.

Moneypenny explained it. Mr. Blackwood has a pair of

tailor’s-shears, and three apprentices who stand by him for

orders. One hands him the “Times,” another the “Examiner” and a

third a “Culley’s New Compendium of Slang-Whang.” Mr. B. merely

cuts out and intersperses. It is soon done—nothing but

“Examiner,” “Slang-Whang,” and “Times”—then “Times,”

“Slang-Whang,” and “Examiner”—and then “Times,” “Examiner,” and

“Slang-Whang.”

But the chief merit of the Magazine lies in its miscellaneous

articles; and the best of these come under the head of what Dr.

Moneypenny calls the bizarreries (whatever that may mean) and

what everybody else calls the intensities. This is a species of

writing which I have long known how to appreciate, although it is

only since my late visit to Mr. Blackwood (deputed by the

society) that I have been made aware of the exact method of

composition. This method is very simple, but not so much so as

the politics. Upon my calling at Mr. B.‘s, and making known to

him the wishes of the society, he received me with great

civility, took me into his study, and gave me a clear explanation

of the whole process.

“My dear madam,” said he, evidently struck with my majestic

appearance, for I had on the crimson satin, with the green

agraffas, and orange-colored auriclas. “My dear madam,” said he,

“sit down. The matter stands thus: In the first place your writer

of intensities must have very black ink, and a very big pen, with

a very blunt nib. And, mark me, Miss Psyche Zenobia!” he

continued, after a pause, with the most expressive energy and

solemnity of manner, “mark me!—that pen—must—never be mended!

Herein, madam, lies the secret, the soul, of intensity. I assume

upon myself to say, that no individual, of however great genius

ever wrote with a good pen—understand me,—a good article. You may

take, it for granted, that when manuscript can be read it is

never worth reading. This is a leading principle in our faith, to

which if you cannot readily assent, our conference is at an end.”

He paused. But, of course, as I had no wish to put an end to the

conference, I assented to a proposition so very obvious, and one,

too, of whose truth I had all along been sufficiently aware. He

seemed pleased, and went on with his instructions.

“It may appear invidious in me, Miss Psyche Zenobia, to refer you

to any article, or set of articles, in the way of model or study,

yet perhaps I may as well call your attention to a few cases. Let

me see. There was ‘The Dead Alive,’ a capital thing!—the record

of a gentleman’s sensations when entombed before the breath was

out of his body—full of tastes, terror, sentiment, metaphysics,

and erudition. You would have sworn that the writer had been born

and brought up in a coffin. Then we had the ‘Confessions of an

Opium-eater’—fine, very fine!—glorious imagination—deep

philosophy acute speculation—plenty of fire and fury, and a good

spicing of the decidedly unintelligible. That was a nice bit of

flummery, and went down the throats of the people delightfully.

They would have it that Coleridge wrote the paper—but not so. It

was composed by my pet baboon, Juniper, over a rummer of Hollands

and water, ‘hot, without sugar.’” [This I could scarcely have

believed had it been anybody but Mr. Blackwood, who assured me of

it.] “Then there was ‘The Involuntary Experimentalist,’ all about

a gentleman who got baked in an oven, and came out alive and

well, although certainly done to a turn. And then there was ‘The

Diary of a Late Physician,’ where the merit lay in good rant, and

indifferent Greek—both of them taking things with the public. And

then there was ‘The Man in the Bell,’ a paper by-the-by, Miss

Zenobia, which I cannot sufficiently recommend to your attention.

It is the history of a young person who goes to sleep under the

clapper of a church bell, and is awakened by its tolling for a

funeral. The sound drives him mad, and, accordingly, pulling out

his tablets, he gives a record of his sensations. Sensations are

the great things after all. Should you ever be drowned or hung,

be sure and make a note of your sensations—they will be worth to

you ten guineas a sheet. If you wish to write forcibly, Miss

Zenobia, pay minute attention to the sensations.”

“That I certainly will, Mr. Blackwood,” said I.

“Good!” he replied. “I see you are a pupil after my own heart.

But I must put you au fait to the details necessary in composing

what may be denominated a genuine Blackwood article of the

sensation stamp—the kind which you will understand me to say I

consider the best for all purposes.

“The first thing requisite is to get yourself into such a scrape

as no one ever got into before. The oven, for instance,—that was

a good hit. But if you have no oven or big bell, at hand, and if

you cannot conveniently tumble out of a balloon, or be swallowed

up in an earthquake, or get stuck fast in a chimney, you will

have to be contented with simply imagining some similar

misadventure. I should prefer, however, that you have the actual

fact to bear you out. Nothing so well assists the fancy, as an

experimental knowledge of the matter in hand. ‘Truth is strange,’

you know, ‘stranger than fiction’—besides being more to the

purpose.”

Here I assured him I had an excellent pair of garters, and would

go and hang myself forthwith.

“Good!” he replied, “do so;—although hanging is somewhat

hacknied. Perhaps you might do better. Take a dose of Brandreth’s

pills, and then give us your sensations. However, my instructions

will apply equally well to any variety of misadventure, and in

your way home you may easily get knocked in the head, or run over

by an omnibus, or bitten by a mad dog, or drowned in a gutter.

But to proceed.

“Having determined upon your subject, you must next consider the

tone, or manner, of your narration. There is the tone didactic,

the tone enthusiastic, the tone natural—all commonplace enough.

But then there is the tone laconic, or curt, which has lately

come much into use. It consists in short sentences. Somehow thus:

Can’t be too brief. Can’t be too snappish. Always a full stop.

And never a paragraph.

“Then there is the tone elevated, diffusive, and interjectional.

Some of our best novelists patronize this tone. The words must be

all in a whirl, like a humming-top, and make a noise very

similar, which answers remarkably well instead of meaning. This

is the best of all possible styles where the writer is in too

great a hurry to think.

“The tone metaphysical is also a good one. If you know any big

words this is your chance for them. Talk of the Ionic and Eleatic

schools—of Archytas, Gorgias, and Alcmaeon. Say something about

objectivity and subjectivity. Be sure and abuse a man named

Locke. Turn up your nose at things in general, and when you let

slip any thing a little too absurd, you need not be at the

trouble of scratching it out, but just add a footnote and say

that you are indebted for the above profound observation to the

‘Kritik der reinem Vernunft,’ or to the ‘Metaphysithe

Anfongsgrunde der Noturwissenchaft.’ This would look erudite

and—and—and frank.

“There are various other tones of equal celebrity, but I shall

mention only two more—the tone transcendental and the tone

heterogeneous. In the former the merit consists in seeing into

the nature of affairs a very great deal farther than anybody

else. This second sight is very efficient when properly managed.

A little reading of the ‘Dial’ will carry you a great way.

Eschew, in this case, big words; get them as small as possible,

and write them upside down. Look over Channing’s poems and quote

what he says about a ‘fat little man with a delusive show of

Can.’ Put in something about the Supernal Oneness. Don’t say a

syllable about the Infernal Twoness. Above all, study innuendo.

Hint everything—assert nothing. If you feel inclined to say

‘bread and butter,’ do not by any means say it outright. You may

say any thing and every thing approaching to ‘bread and butter.’

You may hint at buck-wheat cake, or you may even go so far as to

insinuate oat-meal porridge, but if bread and butter be your real

meaning, be cautious, my dear Miss Psyche, not on any account to

say ‘bread and butter!’”

I assured him that I should never say it again as long as I

lived. He kissed me and continued:

“As for the tone heterogeneous, it is merely a judicious mixture,

in equal proportions, of all the other tones in the world, and is

consequently made up of every thing deep, great, odd, piquant,

pertinent, and pretty.

“Let us suppose now you have determined upon your incidents and

tone. The most important portion—in fact, the soul of the whole

business, is yet to be attended to—I allude to the filling up. It

is not to be supposed that a lady, or gentleman either, has been

leading the life of a book worm. And yet above all things it is

necessary that your article have an air of erudition, or at least

afford evidence of extensive general reading. Now I’ll put you in

the way of accomplishing this point. See here!” (pulling down

some three or four ordinary-looking volumes, and opening them at

random). “By casting your eye down almost any page of any book in

the world, you will be able to perceive at once a host of little

scraps of either learning or bel-esprit-ism, which are the very

thing for the spicing of a Blackwood article. You might as well

note down a few while I read them to you. I shall make two

divisions: first, Piquant Facts for the Manufacture of Similes,

and, second, Piquant Expressions to be introduced as occasion may

require. Write now!”—and I wrote as he dictated.

“PIQUANT FACTS FOR SIMILES. ‘There were originally but three

Muses—Melete, Mneme, Aœde—meditation, memory, and singing.’ You

may make a good deal of that little fact if properly worked. You

see it is not generally known, and looks recherché. You must be

careful and give the thing with a downright improviso air.

“Again. ‘The river Alpheus passed beneath the sea, and emerged

without injury to the purity of its waters.’ Rather stale that,

to be sure, but, if properly dressed and dished up, will look

quite as fresh as ever.

“Here is something better. ‘The Persian Iris appears to some

persons to possess a sweet and very powerful perfume, while to

others it is perfectly scentless.’ Fine that, and very delicate!

Turn it about a little, and it will do wonders. We’ll have some

thing else in the botanical line. There’s nothing goes down so

well, especially with the help of a little Latin. Write!

“‘The Epidendrum Flos Aeris, of Java, bears a very beautiful

flower, and will live when pulled up by the roots. The natives

suspend it by a cord from the ceiling, and enjoy its fragrance

for years.’ That’s capital! That will do for the similes. Now for

the Piquant Expressions.

“PIQUANT EXPRESSIONS. ‘The Venerable Chinese novel Ju-Kiao-Li.’

Good! By introducing these few words with dexterity you will

evince your intimate acquaintance with the language and

literature of the Chinese. With the aid of this you may either

get along without either Arabic, or Sanscrit, or Chickasaw. There

is no passing muster, however, without Spanish, Italian, German,

Latin, and Greek. I must look you out a little specimen of each.

Any scrap will answer, because you must depend upon your own

ingenuity to make it fit into your article. Now write!

“‘Aussi tendre que Zaire’—as tender as Zaire-French. Alludes to

the frequent repetition of the phrase, la tendre Zaire, in the

French tragedy of that name. Properly introduced, will show not

only your knowledge of the language, but your general reading and

wit. You can say, for instance, that the chicken you were eating

(write an article about being choked to death by a chicken-bone)

was not altogether aussi tendre que Zaire. Write!

‘Van muerte tan escondida,

Que no te sienta venir,

Porque el plazer del morir,

No mestorne a dar la vida.’

“That’s Spanish—from Miguel de Cervantes. ‘Come quickly, O death!

but be sure and don’t let me see you coming, lest the pleasure I

shall feel at your appearance should unfortunately bring me back

again to life.’ This you may slip in quite a propos when you are

struggling in the last agonies with the chicken-bone. Write!

‘Il pover ‘huomo che non se’n era accorto,

Andava combattendo, e era morto.‘

“That’s Italian, you perceive—from Ariosto. It means that a great

hero, in the heat of combat, not perceiving that he had been

fairly killed, continued to fight valiantly, dead as he was. The

application of this to your own case is obvious—for I trust, Miss

Psyche, that you will not neglect to kick for at least an hour

and a half after you have been choked to death by that

chicken-bone. Please to write!

‘Und sterb’ich doch, no sterb’ich denn

Durch sie—durch sie!’’

“That’s German—from Schiller. ‘And if I die, at least I die—for

thee—for thee!’ Here it is clear that you are apostrophizing the

cause of your disaster, the chicken. Indeed what gentleman (or

lady either) of sense, wouldn’t die, I should like to know, for a

well fattened capon of the right Molucca breed, stuffed with

capers and mushrooms, and served up in a salad-bowl, with

orange-jellies en mosaïques. Write! (You can get them that way

at Tortoni’s)—Write, if you please!

“Here is a nice little Latin phrase, and rare too, (one can’t be

too recherché or brief in one’s Latin, it’s getting so

common—ignoratio elenchi. He has committed an ignoratio

elenchi—that is to say, he has understood the words of your

proposition, but not the idea. The man was a fool, you see. Some

poor fellow whom you address while choking with that

chicken-bone, and who therefore didn’t precisely understand what

you were talking about. Throw the ignoratio elenchi in his teeth,

and, at once, you have him annihilated. If he dares to reply, you

can tell him from Lucan (here it is) that speeches are mere

anemonae verborum, anemone words. The anemone, with great

brilliancy, has no smell. Or, if he begins to bluster, you may be

down upon him with insomnia Jovis, reveries of Jupiter—a phrase

which Silius Italicus (see here!) applies to thoughts pompous and

inflated. This will be sure and cut him to the heart. He can do

nothing but roll over and die. Will you be kind enough to write?

“In Greek we must have some thing pretty—from Demosthenes, for

example. Ανερο φευων και παλιν μαχεσεται. [Aner o pheugoen kai

palin makesetai.] There is a tolerably good translation of it in

Hudibras—

‘For he that flies may fight again,

Which he can never do that’s slain.’

In a Blackwood article nothing makes so fine a show as your

Greek. The very letters have an air of profundity about them.

Only observe, madam, the astute look of that Epsilon! That Phi

ought certainly to be a bishop! Was ever there a smarter fellow

than that Omicron? Just twig that Tau! In short, there is nothing

like Greek for a genuine sensation-paper. In the present case

your application is the most obvious thing in the world. Rap out

the sentence, with a huge oath, and by way of ultimatum at the

good-for-nothing dunder-headed villain who couldn’t understand

your plain English in relation to the chicken-bone. He’ll take

the hint and be off, you may depend upon it.”

These were all the instructions Mr. B. could afford me upon the

topic in question, but I felt they would be entirely sufficient.

I was, at length, able to write a genuine Blackwood article, and

determined to do it forthwith. In taking leave of me, Mr. B. made

a proposition for the purchase of the paper when written; but as

he could offer me only fifty guineas a sheet, I thought it better

to let our society have it, than sacrifice it for so paltry a

sum. Notwithstanding this niggardly spirit, however, the

gentleman showed his consideration for me in all other respects,

and indeed treated me with the greatest civility. His parting

words made a deep impression upon my heart, and I hope I shall

always remember them with gratitude.

“My dear Miss Zenobia,” he said, while the tears stood in his

eyes, “is there anything else I can do to promote the success of

your laudable undertaking? Let me reflect! It is just possible

that you may not be able, so soon as convenient, to—to—get

yourself drowned, or—choked with a chicken-bone, or—or

hung,—or—bitten by a—but stay! Now I think me of it, there are a

couple of very excellent bull-dogs in the yard—fine fellows, I

assure you—savage, and all that—indeed just the thing for your

money—they’ll have you eaten up, auricula and all, in less than

five minutes (here’s my watch!)—and then only think of the

sensations! Here! I say—Tom!—Peter!—Dick, you villain!—let out

those”—but as I was really in a great hurry, and had not another

moment to spare, I was reluctantly forced to expedite my

departure, and accordingly took leave at once—somewhat more

abruptly, I admit, than strict courtesy would have otherwise

allowed.

It was my primary object upon quitting Mr. Blackwood, to get into

some immediate difficulty, pursuant to his advice, and with this

view I spent the greater part of the day in wandering about

Edinburgh, seeking for desperate adventures—adventures adequate

to the intensity of my feelings, and adapted to the vast

character of the article I intended to write. In this excursion I

was attended by one negro servant, Pompey, and my little lap-dog

Diana, whom I had brought with me from Philadelphia. It was not,

however, until late in the afternoon that I fully succeeded in my

arduous undertaking. An important event then happened of which

the following Blackwood article, in the tone heterogeneous, is

the substance and result.